FAQ About Studying Law

The Socratic method of teaching is a popular instructional technique used in many law schools. It is named after the ancient Greek philosopher Socrates, who employed a similar approach to engage students in critical thinking and active participation. In the context of law school, the Socratic method involves the following key elements:

• Questioning: The professor poses questions to individual students during class discussions. These questions are designed to challenge the students' understanding of legal concepts, analyze case law, apply legal principles to hypothetical scenarios, and encourage critical thinking.
• Case-Based Discussions: The Socratic method often centers around the discussion of legal cases. The professor typically selects specific cases and uses them as the basis for the classroom dialogue. Students are expected to read and analyze the assigned cases in advance, as they may be called upon to discuss and analyze them during class.
• Dialogue and Engagement: Through the Socratic method, the professor engages students in an interactive dialogue rather than delivering a lecture. The questioning and discussion format encourages students to actively participate, think on their feet, articulate their thoughts, and defend their legal reasoning. This fosters a dynamic and intellectually stimulating classroom environment.
• Challenging Assumptions: The Socratic method aims to challenge students' assumptions and push them to explore different perspectives and interpretations. By posing probing questions, the professor may challenge the students' initial understanding of a case or legal concept, encouraging them to reevaluate their reasoning and explore alternative viewpoints.
• Developing Legal Analysis Skills: The Socratic method helps develop students' legal analysis and argumentation skills. Through the dialogue and questioning, students learn to dissect legal issues, identify relevant facts, apply legal principles, and construct persuasive arguments based on legal precedent and reasoning.